Power transmission apparatus, power receiving apparatus, wireless power transmission system, and control methods thereof

ABSTRACT

A power transmission apparatus that transmits power wirelessly to a power receiving apparatus by using power supplied from a power supply apparatus includes a first authentication unit configured to execute device authentication with the power supply apparatus, a second authentication unit configured to execute device authentication with the power receiving apparatus, and a control unit that performs negotiation related to transmission power with the power receiving apparatus based on a result of the device authentication by the first authentication unit and a result of the device authentication by the second authentication unit.

TECHNICAL FIELD

The present invention relates to a wireless power transmission system.

BACKGROUND ART

In recent years, wireless power transmission techniques are being widelydeveloped. Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 2016-007116 discloses a powertransmission apparatus and power receiving apparatus complying with aspecification (WPC specification) defined by the Wireless PowerConsortium, a standards organization for contactless chargingspecifications. Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 2010-104097 also disclosesa device authentication method for contactless charging between a powertransmission apparatus and a power receiving apparatus. According toJapanese Patent Laid-Open No. 2010-104097, the power transmissionapparatus transmits challenge data to the power receiving apparatus viaa power transmission coil, and the power receiving apparatus transmitsresponse data, which is generated by performing authenticationcalculation on the challenge data, to the power transmission apparatusvia a power receiving coil. The power transmission apparatus executes adevice authentication protocol by collating the response data receivedfrom the power receiving apparatus.

In a power transmission apparatus, there is known an arrangement ofreceiving power from an external power supply (for example, an ACadapter) via a cable (for example, a USB cable) for the wirelesstransmission of the power to a power receiving apparatus. If theseexternal power supply apparatuses such as the AC adapter and the cableare not valid devices, excessive power can be supplied to the powertransmission apparatus and the power receiving apparatus. Hence, it isdesirable to perform device authentication on the AC adapter and thecable as well to confirm their validity and to perform wireless powertransmission by power corresponding to the validity authenticated by thedevice authentication.

Also, for example, in a case in which higher power is to be transmitteddue to an update of a specification such as the WPC specification, a newdevice authentication process may be adopted to authenticate thevalidity of a device. In this case, it is desirable to maintain thecompatibility with apparatuses supporting an earlier specification whichwas used before the adoption of the new device authentication.Furthermore, it is desirable to execute wireless power transmission byusing higher power in a case in which wireless power transmission is tobe performed between apparatuses whose validity have been proven by thedevice authentication, and to execute wireless power transmission byusing power that can be supplied by the old version even in a case inwhich apparatuses cannot undergo device authentication by the oldversion.

SUMMARY OF INVENTION

An embodiment according the present invention provides a powertransmission apparatus, a power receiving apparatus, a wireless powertransmission system, and control methods thereof that can advantageouslyuse an authentication result or a result of determining whether deviceauthentication is executable in a wireless power transmission operationin which device authentication for authenticating the validity of adevice can be executed.

According to one aspect of the present invention there is provided apower transmission apparatus that transmits power wirelessly to a powerreceiving apparatus by using power supplied from a power supplyapparatus, comprising: first authentication means for executing deviceauthentication with the power supply apparatus; second authenticationmeans for executing device authentication with the power receivingapparatus; and negotiation means for performing negotiation related totransmission power with the power receiving apparatus based on a resultof the device authentication by the first authentication means and aresult of the device authentication by the second authentication means.

According to another aspect of the present invention there is provided apower receiving apparatus that receives power wirelessly transmittedfrom a power transmission apparatus, comprising: authentication meansfor executing device authentication with the power transmissionapparatus; notification means for notifying the power transmissionapparatus that the power receiving apparatus has a function forexecuting a device authentication to the power transmission apparatus;determination means for determining, based on a response from the powertransmission apparatus to the notification by the notification means,whether the power transmission apparatus supports the deviceauthentication; execution means for executing the device authenticationby the authentication means if it is determined by the determinationmeans that the power transmission apparatus supports the deviceauthentication; and power receiving means for receiving powertransmitted from the power transmission apparatus for supplying powercorresponding to one of a result of the determination by thedetermination means and a result of the device authentication by theexecution means.

According to another aspect of he present invention there is provided awireless power transmission system comprising: a power supply apparatus;a power transmission apparatus configured to transmit power wirelesslyby using power supplied, from the power supply apparatus; a powerreceiving apparatus configured to receive power wirelessly transmittedfrom the power transmission apparatus; first authentication means forcausing the power transmission apparatus to execute deviceauthentication with the power supply apparatus; second authenticationmeans for causing the power transmission apparatus to execute deviceauthentication with the power receiving apparatus; and negotiation meansfor causing the power transmission apparatus and the power receivingapparatus to perform negotiation related to transmission power based ona result of the device authentication by the first authentication meansand a result of the device authentication by the second authenticationmeans.

According to another aspect of the present invention there is provided amethod of controlling a power transmission apparatus that transmitspower wirelessly to a power receiving apparatus by using power suppliedfrom a power supply apparatus, the method comprising: executing deviceauthentication with the power supply apparatus; executing deviceauthentication with the power receiving apparatus; and performingnegotiation related to transmission power with the power receivingapparatus based on a result obtained in the executing the deviceauthentication with the power supply apparatus and a result obtained inthe executing the device authentication with the power receivingapparatus.

According to another aspect the present invention there is provided amethod of controlling a power receiving apparatus that receives powertransmitted wirelessly from a power transmission apparatus, the methodcomprising: executing device authentication with the power transmissionapparatus; notifying the power transmission apparatus that the powerreceiving apparatus has a function for executing a device authenticationto the power transmission apparatus; determining, based on a responsefrom the power transmission apparatus to a notification in thenotifying, whether the power transmission apparatus supports the deviceauthentication; and executing device authentication in the executing ifit is determined in the determining that the power transmissionapparatus supports the device authentication.

According to another aspect of the present invention there is provided amethod of controlling a wireless power transmission system comprising apower supply apparatus, a power transmission apparatus configured totransmit power wirelessly by using power supplied from the power supplyapparatus, and a power receiving apparatus configured to receive powerwirelessly transmitted from the power transmission apparatus, the methodcomprising: causing the power transmission apparatus to execute deviceauthentication with the power supply apparatus, causing the powertransmission apparatus to execute device authentication with the powerreceiving apparatus, and causing the power transmission apparatus andthe power receiving apparatus to perform negotiation related totransmission power based on a result obtained in the causing the powertransmission apparatus to execute the device authentication with thepower supply apparatus and a result obtained in the causing the powertransmission apparatus to execute the device authentication with thepower receiving apparatus.

Further features of the present invention will become apparent from thefollowing description of exemplary embodiments (with reference to theattached drawings).

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing an example of the arrangement of apower transmission apparatus according to an embodiment,

FIG. 2 is a block diagram showing an example of the arrangement of apower receiving apparatus according to the embodiment.

FIG. 3 is a block diagram showing an example of the arrangement of acontactless charging system according to the embodiment.

FIG. 4 is an operation sequence chart of the contactless charging systemincluding USB authentication and WPT authentication.

FIG. 5 is a flowchart showing GP setting processing by a controlunit ofthe power transmission apparatus.

FIG. 6 is a table showing the relationship between device authenticationresults and GP setting values.

FIG. 7 is a flowchart showing the transition of states until powertransmission by the control unit of the power transmission apparatus.

FIG. 8A is a sequence chart related to communication between the powertransmission apparatus and the power receiving apparatus.

FIG. 8B is a sequence chart related to communication between the powertransmission apparatus and the power receiving apparatus.

FIG. 8C is a sequence chart related to communication betweenthe powertransmission apparatus and the power receiving apparatus.

FIG. 8D is a sequence chart related to cotrununicatiort between thepower transmission apparatus and the power receiving apparatus.

FIG. 8E is a sequence chart related to communication between the powertransmission apparatus and the power receiving apparatus.

FIG. 9A is a flowchart showing the transition of states until powertransmission by a control unit of the power receiving apparatus.

FIG. 9B is a flowchart showing the transition of states until powertransmission by the control unit of the power receiving apparatus.

FIG. 9C is a flowchart showing the transition of states until powertransmission by the control unit of the power receiving apparatus.

FIG. 10A is a view showing the arrangement of a configuration packet.

FIG. 10B is a view showing the arrangement of a power transmittercapability packet.

DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS

An embodiment of the present invention will be described hereinafterwith reference to the accompanying drawings. In the embodiment to bedescribed hereinafter, device authentication that also confirms thevalidity of an AC adapter and a cable which are to serve as power supplyapparatuses for a power transmission apparatus in addition to validityof the power apparatus will be described, in addition, the followingembodiment will describe a mechanism for performing wireless powertransmission while ensuring safety even in a case in which deviceauthentication is not supported by the AC adapter and the cable whichare to serve as the power supply apparatuses for the power transmissionapparatus. Furthermore, there will be described a control method fordevice authentication with a power supply and for suitable wirelesspower transmission between the power transmission apparatus and thepower receiving apparatus via the power transmission coil and the powerreceiving coil by using a plurality of types of device authenticationprotocols of device authentication.

FIG. 3 is a block diagram showing an example of the arrangement of acontactless charging system as a wireless power transmission systemaccording to the embodiment. In FIG. 3, a power transmission apparatus(to be referred to as a TX 100 hereinafter) wirelessly transmits power,which is supplied from an AC adapter 301 via a USB cable 300, to a powerreceiving apparatus (to be referred to as an RX 200). The RX 200receives the power transmitted wirelessly from the TX 100 and charges,for example, a battery. The AC adapter 301 supplies power to the TX 100by converting power from a commercial power supply supplied via a powerplug 302 into a voltage suitable for TX 100.

FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing an example of the arrangement of thepower transmission apparatus (TX 100) applicable to the contactlesscharging system shown in FIG. 3. The TX 100 is in compliance with theWPC specification and has functions described in the WPC specificationv1.2.2. Assume that the TX 100 according to this embodiment has thecapability to supply power that is enough to output power up to amaximum of 15 W to a charging unit of the power receiving apparatus (RX200) which is also in compliance with the WPC specification. Note thatthe TX 100 and the RX 200 will be described as apparatuses which are incompliance with the WPC specification. However, the present invention isnot limited to this, and other contactless charging specifications maybe used.

A control unit 101 controls the overall TX 100. An example of thecontrol unit 101 is a central processing unit (CPU). A power source 102is in compliance with the USB Power-Delivery specification and is alsoin compliance with the USB authentication specification by which deviceauthentication between connected USB devices is performed. The powersource 102 receives operational power for the TX 100 from the AC adapter301 via the USB cable 300 and supplies the power to cause at least thecontrol unit 101 and a power transmission unit 103 to operate. The powertransmission unit 103 generates an AC voltage and an AC current to betransmitted to the power receiving apparatus (RX 200) via a powertransmission coil 105. More specifically, the power transmission unitconverts the DC voltage supplied by the power source 102 into the ACvoltage by a switching circuit that has a half-bridge or full-bridgeconfiguration using an FET. The power transmission unit 103 includes agate driver that controls the ON/OFF of the FET.

A communication unit 104 executes wireless power transmission controlcommunication with the RX 200 (a communication unit 204 in FIG. 2) basedon the WPC specification. In this embodiment, assume that communicationexecuted by the communication unit 104 is so-called inboundcommunication in which communication is superimposed on wireless powerby modulating the AC voltage or current generated by the powertransmission unit 103. However, the present invention is not limited tothis, and the communication unit may execute outbound communicationwhich uses a frequency different from the frequency of the powertransmission. unit 103. For example, NEC, REID, Wi-Fi (IEE 802.11series), Bluetooth™, or the like may be employed for the outboundcommunication. A display unit 106 displays and notifies a user of thestate of the TX 100 itself or the state of the contactless chargingsystem including devices such as the TX 100, the RX 200, the USB cable300, the AC adapter 301, and the like as shown in FIG. 3. In thisembodiment, the display unit 106 is described as an LED. However, thedisplay unit may have another arrangement as long as it can notify theuser of the aforementioned state, and may be a loudspeaker, a vibrationgenerating circuit, or a display.

A memory 107 stores the overall state and the state of each component ofthe TX 100 and the contactless charging system (FIG. 3). A firstauthentication unit 108 performs device authentication of the powersource 102 and the USB cable 300 and the AC adapter 301 which areconnected to the power source 102. In this embodiment, the firstauthentication unit 108 is described as a unit that is in compliancewith the USB authentication specification. However, the firstauthentication unit may be in compliance with another specification thatsupports device authentication, may be the Quick Charge specification byQualcomm, or may be in compliance with a specification other than these.A second authentication unit 109 performs device authentication betweenthe TX 100 and the RX 200 by communication via the communication unit104. The device authentication performed by the second authenticationunit 109 will be called Wireless Power Transfer authentication (WPTauthentication) in this embodiment.

Although the control unit 101, the power source 102, the powertransmission unit 103, the communication unit 104, the memory 107, thefirst authentication unit 108, and the second authentication unit 109are described as separate components in FIG. 1, an arbitrary pluralityof these components may be incorporated in a single chip. For example,the power source 102 complying with the Power Delivery specification andthe first authentication unit 108 complying with the USB authenticationspecification may be incorporated in a single chip as a USB-relatedchip. In this case, the control unit 101 and the USB-related chip may heconnected by, for example, general purpose input/output (GPIO) or serialcommunication.

FIG. 2 is a block diagram showing an example of the arrangement of thepower receiving apparatus (RX 200) according to this embodiment. The RX200 is in compliance with a specification defined by WPC and has afunction described in the WPC specification v11.2.2.

In the RX 200, a control unit 201 controls the overall RX 200. Anexample of the control unit 201 is a CPU. A power receiving unit 203converts the AC voltage and the AC current, which are received from thepower transmission coil 105 via a power receiving coil 205, into the DCvoltage and the DC current used for operating the control unit 201 and acharging unit 206. Assume that the power receiving unit 203 according tothis embodiment has the capability to output power up to a maximum of115 W to the charging unit 206.

The communication unit 204 executes contactiess charging controlcommunication with the communication unit 104 of the TX 100 based on theWPC specification. This control communication is so-called inboundcommunication of executing load modulation on electromagnetic wavesreceived via the power receiving coil 205. However, the presentinvention is not limited to this, and the communication unit may performoutbound communication by using a frequency different form the frequencyof the power transmission unit 103. NEC, RFID, Wi-Fi (IEEE802.11series), Bluetooth or the like may he employed for the outboundcommunication.

The charging unit 206 charges a battery 207 by using the DC voltage andthe DC current supplied from the power receiving unit 203. Anauthentication unit 208 performs WPT authentication between the TX 100(second authentication unit 109) and the RX 200 by communication via thecommunication unit 204. A memory 209 stores the overall state and thestate of each component of the RX 200 and the contactless chargingsystem (FIG. 3). Note that a state in which the TX 100 or the RX 200 isin compliance with the WPC specification including the WPTauthentication will be expressed hereinafter as a state in compliancewith the WPC specification version A. Here, assume that the WPCspecification version A is a specification succeeding the WPCspecification v1.2.2, and at least a WPT authentication function hasbeen added to this WPC specification version A.

A display unit 202 displays the power supply state, the charging state,and the like. In this embodiment, the display unit 202 will be describedas an LED. However, the display unit may have another arrangement aslong as it can notify the user of the aforementioned states, and may be,for example, a loudspeaker, a vibration generation circuit, or adisplay. Note that although the power receiving unit 203, theauthentication unit 208, the control unit 201, the memory 209, thecommunication unit 204, and the charging unit 206 are described asseparate components in FIG. 2, an arbitrary plurality of thesecomponents may be incorporated in a single chip.

The first authentication unit 108 of the TX 100 performs, in thecontactless charging system according to this embodiment which includesthe above-described arrangement, device authentication by using the ACadapter 301, the USB cable 300, and a first communication protocol (forexample, USB authentication via the USB cable). The secondauthentication unit 109 of the TX 100 performs device authenticationwith the RX 200 by using a second communication protocol that usesdifferent media (for example, the power transmission coil 105 and thepower receiving coil 205) from the media used by the first communicationprotocol for communication.

The AC adapter 301, the USB cable 300, and the TX 100 (power source 102)are USB devices in the contactless charging system according to theembodiment shown in FIG. 3. A state in which the USB devices support USBauthentication and succeed in USB authentication indicates that thesedevices have no risks such as overheating and the like when powerpredetermined by the USB authentication is applied. That is, when USBauthentication is successful, the power source 102 of the TX 100, theUSB cable 300, and the AC adapter 301 will not overheat even ifpredetermined power is supplied. from the AC adapter 301 to the powersource 102 of the TX 100 via the USB cable 300.

If one of the power source 102 of the TX 100, the USB cable 300, and theAC adapter 301, which form the power supply path to the powertransmission unit 103 of the TX 100, does not support USBauthentication, USB authentication will not be successful, as a matterof course. In this case, when the predetermined power is applied, thereare risks such as overheating and the like for the device that does notsupport the USB authentication. A state in which a device does notsupport the USB authentication described here includes a state in whichthe device is in compliance with one of the plurality of previousversions of USB specifications set before the current USB authenticationspecification was defined. In this embodiment, assume that a UBS devicein compliance with one of the plurality of previous versions of USBspecifications set before the USB authentication specification wasdefined will be called a legacy USB device.

If USB authentication fails in one of the power source 102 of the TX100, the USB cable 300, and the AC adapter 301, since this is also acase in which USB authentication is unsuccessful, the aforementionedrisks are present when the aforementioned predetermined power isapplied. Here, a state in which the USB authentication fails includes astate in which there is a possibility that one or both of the USB cable300 and the AC adapter 301 may be malicious USB devices that may seem tosupport USB authentication but actually do not support the USBauthentication.

A case in which the RX 200 and the TX 100 are in compliance with the WPCspecification version A and succeed in WPT authentication representsthat there are no risks such as overheating and the like even if the RX200 and the TX 100 exchange predetermined power. On the other hand, WPTauthentication does not succeed when one or both of the RX 200 and theTX 100 are not in compliance with the WPC specification version A. Inthis case, if the aforementioned predetermined power is supplied, eachapparatus that is not in compliance with the WPC specification version Acarries risks such as overheating and the like. Here, a state in whichan apparatus is not in compliance with the WPC specification version Aincludes a state in which the apparatus is in compliance with one of theplurality of previous versions of the WPC specifications set before theWPC specification version A. In this embodiment, assume that a TX or anRX in compliance with one of the plurality of previous versions of WPCspecifications set before the WPC specification version A will be calleda legacy TX or a legacy RX.

If the WPT authentication fails for the TX 100 and the RX 200, there isa possibility that the TX or the RX may be a malicious TX or RX whichmay seem to be in compliance with WPT authentication but is actually notin compliance with the WPT authentication (because authentication isalways successful if the apparatus supports the WPT authentication). Inthis case, since the WPT authentication is unsuccessful, there are riskssuch as overheating and the like when the aforementioned predeterminedpower is applied.

In this embodiment, it is determined that predetermined power can besupplied safely when the USB authentication of the USB cable 300 and theAC adapter 301 is successful and the WPT authentication of the RX 200and the TX 100 is successful. That is, even if the power receiving unit203 of the RX 200 supplies the predetermined power (15 W) to a load (thecharging unit 206 in this embodiment), there will be no risks such asoverheating and the like. On the other hand, there is a possibility thatthe predetermined power cannot be supplied safely when the USBauthentication of one of the TX 100 (power source 102), the USB cable300, and the AC adapter 301 is unsuccessful or when the WPTauthentication of either the RX 200 or the TX 100 is unsuccessful. Thatis, if the power receiving unit 203 of the RX 200 supplies thepredetermined power of 15 W to the load, there will he risks such asoverheating and the like. Assume that the power supplied by the powerreceiving unit 203 is restricted to power (for example, 5 W or less)lower than the predetermined power (for example, 15 W) whenauthentication is unsuccessful to avoid these risks hereinafter.

In the related arts, however, a control method considering thisplurality of authentication methods in a system where a plurality ofdevice authentication protocols such as the USB authentication and theWPT authentication are present as described above has not been proposed.

FIG. 4 is a sequence chart which includes the USB authentication and theWPT authentication according to this embodiment. FIG. 5 is a flowchartshowing an operation of the control unit 101 of the power transmission.apparatus (TX 100) related to a guaranteed power (to be referred to asGP hereinafter) setting according to this embodiment. GP represents apower value which is guaranteed for the output power to the load of thepower receiving unit 203 even if the positional relationship of the TX100 and the RX 200 is shifted and the power transmission efficiencybetween the power transmission coil 105 and the power receiving coil 205is reduced. The load of the power receiving unit 203 is the power supplysubject of the power receiving unit 203 and includes at least thecharging unit 206. For example, if the GP is 5 W, the TX 100 controlsthe power transmission unit 103 so that the power receiving unit 203 canoutput a power of 5 W even if the power transmission efficiency betweenthe coils has been reduced by the shifting of the positionalrelationship between the power transmission coil and the power receptioncoils. The operation (GP determination operation) shown in FIGS. 4 and 5will he described later in the explanation of FIG. 6.

FIG. 6 is a table showing an example of each GP restriction value whichis used in a negotiation (to be described later) in accordance with theresult of the USB authentication and the WPT authentication.

The “USB authentication non-support” of a column 600 indicates a statein which at least one of the power source 102 of the TX 100, the USBcable 300, and the AC adapter 301 does not support USB authentication(however, authentication has been successful in each device supportingthe USB authentication). The “USB authentication failure” of a column601 indicates a state in which the USB authentication has failed for oneof the power source 102 of the TX 100, the USB cable 300, and the ACadapter 301 despite the fact that USB authentication is supported by thedevice. The “USB authentication success” of a column 602 indicates astate in which the USB authentication has been successful for each ofthe power source 102 of the TX 100, the USB cable 300, and the ACadapter 301. A row 603 indicates a state in which the RX 200 does notsupport the WPT authentication, a row 604 indicates a state in which theWPT authentication has failed for the RX 200 despite supporting WPTauthentication, and a row 605 indicates a state in which the WPTauthentication has been successful in the RX 200 which supports the WPTauthentication. Note that when three types of GP voltage values, “0,2.5, 5” are written in a field in the table, it will be predetermined sothat one of the values will be employed.

According to FIG. 6, in the case of a USB authentication non-supportstate (column 600), power transmission which avoids risks such asoverheating can be executed, regardless of the result of the WPTauthentication, by restricting the GP to 5 W. In the case of a WPTauthentication failure state (row 604) of the column 600, the GP may berestricted to a value which is smaller than the case of a WPTauthentication non-support state (row 603) such as 0 W (no powertransmission) or 2.5 W (lower than 5 W). This is because the failure ofWPT authentication indicates that the RX may be a malicious RX (forexample, a fake apparatus not satisfying the WPC specification) thatsupports WPT authentication but does not accurately support the WPTauthentication. Although it suffices to restrict the GP to 5 W from theviewpoint of the above-described risks such as overheating and the like,restricting the GP to GP (0 W or 2.5 W) that is lower than the GP of thelegacy RX, which does not support the WPT authentication but isaccurately in compliance with the specification, has the merit ofelimnating a fake apparatus.

In the same manner, in the case of a USB authentication failure state(column 601), the GP may be restricted to a value which is smaller thanthe case of the USB authentication non-support state (column 600) suchas 0 W (no power transmission) or 2.5 W (lower than 5 W). This isbecause the failure of USB authentication indicates that the USB devicemay be a malicious USB device that supports the USB authentication butdoes not accurately support the USB authentication. Hence, restrictingthe GP to 0 W or 2.5 W which is lower than the GP of the legacy USBwhich does not support the USB authentication but is accurately incompliance with the specification has the merit of eliminating a fakeapparatus.

Also the case of a USB authentication success state (column 602)indicates that there are no above-described risks for the power source102 of the TX 100, the USB cable 300, and AC adapter 301 related to theUSB in the system of FIG. 3 even if the RX 200 supplies power of 15 W tothe load. Hence, the TX 100 sets the GP based on the result of the WPTauthentication. In the case of the WPT authentication non-support state(row 603), the GP is set to 5 W based on the above-described reasons,and in the case of the WPT authentication failure state (row 604), theGP is restricted to a lower GP value (0 W or 2.5 W). In the case inwhich the USB authentication is successful (column 602) and the WPTauthentication is also successful (row 605), it is determined that thereare no above-described risks, and the TX 100 sets 15 W, which is themaximum value of capability of each of the TX 100 and the RX 200, as theGP restriction value. In this manner, when all of the deviceauthentication operations of the USB authentication and the WPTauthentication are successful, power transmission by the maximumcapability of the TX 100 and the RX 200 is determined in the negotiationperformed in a negotiation phase (to be described later).

<Sequence from Activation to Power Transmission in Contactless ChargingSystem>

The sequence from the activation to power transmission in thecontactless charging system shown in FIG. 3 will be described by usingFIGS. 4 and 5. The TX 100 operates, in the USB authentication and theWET authentication, so as to restrict the transmission power if there isat least one device that does not support the authentication operationsor whose authentication has failed among the authentication subjectdevices.

When the USB cable 300 and the AC adapter 301 are connected to the powersource 102 of the TX 100 (400), the control unit 101 of the TX 100performs USB authentication (401, step S501). In the USB authentication,the control unit 101 causes the first authentication unit 108 to operateand determines whether USB authentication is supported by all of theauthentication-subject USB devices (both the USB cable 300 and the ACadapter 301 in the embodiment). The first authentication unit 108executes the USB authentication for all of the USB devices anddetermines “USB authentication success” when all of the executed USBauthentication operations are successful. Also, in this embodiment, “USBauthentication non-support” and “USB authentication failure” have beenset as authentication results for cases in which the USB authenticationfor all of the USB devices have failed. If there is even one devicewhich supports USB authentication but has failed to be authenticated,“USB authentication failure” is determined. When all of the devices inwhich authentication has not been successful are devices which do notsupport the USB authentication, “USB authentication non-support” isdetermined.

For example, in a case in which the USB authentication of the AC adapter301 is successful but the USB cable 300 does not support the USBauthentication, “USB authentication non-support” is determined. Also,for example, in a case in which the USB authentication of the AC adapter301 is successful but the USB authentication of the USB cable 300 hasfailed despite the USB authentication being supported in the USB cable,“USB authentication failure” is determined. Additionally, for example,the USB authentication of both the AC adapter 301 and the USB cable 300is successful, “USB authentication success” is determined. The controlunit 101 holds these USB authentication results in the memory 107 (stepS502).

Next, the control unit 101 determines, with respect to the AC adapter301, the power specification of the voltage and the current suppliedfrom the AC adapter 301 based on the sequence of USB PD (USB PowerDelivery specification) (402). Since the power voltage is determined bythe internal arrangement of the TX 100, a current value is determined inthis case. Assume that the voltage of the power source 102 in the systemof FIG. 3 is 15 V and that the output current of the power source 102 isa maximum of 3 A. Here, to decrease the current value, the control unit101 of the TX 100 executes a determination operation as shown in FIG. 6,For example, in the case of “USB authentication non-support”, 5 W isdetermined as the maximum GP value by the negotiation in the negotiationphase (to be described later) of the WPC specification based on thecolumn 600 of FIG. 6.

The control unit 101 determines the current value in consideration ofloss inside the TX 100. For example, assume that the positions of thepower transmission coil and the power receiving coil have changed andthat the system efficiency is 50% when 5 W, which is the GP whenefficiency between the coils is at its lowest, is output to the RX 200.In this case, the power supplied by the power source 102 to the powertransmission unit 103 and the control unit 101 is 10 W (5 W×2). Sincethe power voltage is 115 V, the output current is 0.67 A. In thisembodiment, in a case in which one of the USB devices does not supportthe USB authentication, it suffices to restrict the GP to 5 W in orderto avoid the risks. Hence, the current value which is to be determinedby the power source 102 by negotiating with the AC adapter 301 based onthe sequence of the USB PD suffices to be about 0.67 A. Based on thiscurrent value to be determined, the control unit 101 of the TX 100determines the power specification with the AC adapter 301. On the otherhand, in a case in which the USB authentication is successful, the powerspecification is determined to be 2.0 A (15 W×2/15 V) so that a GP valueof 15 W can be supported.

The control unit 101 of the TX 100 activates the power transmission unit103 (403). Activation of the power transmission unit 103 may be executedby the so-called power-only setting of inputting power from the powersource 102 to at least one of the control unit 101, the powertransmission unit 103, and the communication unit 104. Alternatively,the first authentication unit 108 may reset at least one of the controlunit 101, the power transmission unit 103, and the communication unit104 by inputting a reset signal (LO: approximately 0 V) (not shown) toat least one of the control unit 101, the power transmission unit 103,and the communication unit 104 of the TX 100. In this case, the firstauthentication unit 108 cancels the reset by changing the reset signalto HI (for example, 3.3 V) after the power specification is determinedand the GP value has been determined.

When the power transmission unit 103 is activated, the TX 100 starts anoperation in compliance with the WPC specification. In this embodiment,in addition to each phase in compliance with the WPC specification, anauthentication phase is defined as a phase to perform WPTauthentication. In the authentication phase, the TX and the RX performdevice authentication operations based on the WPT authentication. Ifboth the TX and the RX support the authentication phase, the TX and theRX undergo state transition in the order of a selection phase, a pingphase, an identification & configuration phase (I & C phase), anauthentication phase, a negotiation phase, a calibration phase, and apower transfer phase (PT phase).

More specifically, first in the selection phase, the power transmissionunit 103 transmits an analog ping via the power transmission coil 105(405). An analog ping is an extremely low power signal for detecting anobject which is present near the power transmission coil 105. The TX 100detects the voltage value or the current value of the power transmissioncoil at the transmission of the analog ping, determines that an objectis present if the voltage is below a predetermined threshold or if thecurrent value exceeds a predetermined threshold, and transits theprocess to the ping phase.

In the ping phase, the TX 100 transmits a digital ping with higher powerthan the analog ping. The digital ping has sufficient power to activatethe control unit 201 of the RX 200 present near the power transmissioncoil 105. After being activated by the digital ping received via thepower receiving coil 205, the control unit 201 of the RX 200 notifiesthe TX 100 of the magnitude of the received voltage (407) and transitsto the I & C phase. Upon receiving the notification of the receivedvoltage value, the TX 100 transits to the I & C phase. Next, the RX 200transmits an ID packet and a configuration packet to the TX 100 (408,409).

Next, the second authentication unit 109 executes the WPT authenticationprocessing in the authentication phase (410, S503). The authenticationsubject is the RX 200 as the power receiving apparatus in the wirelesspower transmission system. The control unit 101 holds this WPTauthentication result in the memory 107 (step S504). The control unit101 determines (404, step S505) the maximum value of the GP which is tobe used in the negotiation phase based on FIG. 6 and the USBauthentication result held in the memory 107 in step S502 and the WPTauthentication held in the memory 107 in step S504. The details of theauthentication phase will be described later with reference to FIG. 8E.

Subsequently, the control unit 101 of the TX 100 determines the GP bythe negotiation with the RX 200 in the negotiation phase (411). Here, anegotiation is performed so that the transmission power will be equal toor less than the GP value (404), that is, the permitted transmissionpower, which has been restricted based on the device authenticationresults by the first authentication unit 108 (USB authentication) andthe second authentication unit 109 (WPT authentication). For example, ifthe USB authentication result is “USB authentication success” and theWPT authentication result is “WPT authentication success”, the GP ispermitted to he set up to 15 W as shown in FIG. 6. On the other hand, ifthe USB authentication result is “USB authentication non-support”, theGP is restricted to 5 W or less. In this case, if the GP exceeding 5 Wis requested from the control unit 201 of the RX 200 in the negotiationphase, the control unit 101 of the TX 100 transmits a NAK to therequest. Otherwise, if the GP which is equal to or lower than therestriction value is requested, the control unit 101 transmits anacknowledgement (ACK).

As described above, since the control unit 101 of the TX 100 sets the GPbased on the results from both the USB authentication and the WPTauthentication, risks such as overheating and the like can be avoided byrestricting the magnitude of the GP when one authentication of theplurality of authentication operations fails. Only in a case in whichall of the authentication operations are successful, the GP can be setto the maximum value of the capability of the power transmission unit103.

Next, the control unit 101 of the TX 100 transmits (412) a reasonnotification to notify the control unit 201 of the RX 200 of the reasonfor the restriction of the GP. The device authentication results fromthe first authentication unit 108 and the second authentication unit 109are transmitted by the reason notification to the RX 200 which is thepower receiving apparatus. This reason notification may be a RESULTpacket (820 of FIG. 8E) which will be described later. In thisembodiment, the control unit 101 of the TX 100 stores the WPTauthentication result and the USB authentication result related to thepower source 102 of the TX 100 in the RESULT packet and transmits theRESULT packet to the control unit 201 of the RX 200. For example, thecontrol unit 101 sets 1 bit for storing the WPT authentication result inthe RESULT packet and stores “1” if the WPT authentication is successfulor stores “0” if the WPT authentication is unsuccessful. The controlunit 101 sets 1 bit for storing the USB authentication results of the ACadapter 301 and the USB cable 300 in the RESULT packet and stores “1” ifall of the USB authentication operations are successful or stores “0” ifthey are not. In this manner, the control unit 101 transmits a RESULTpacket in which the device authentication results are stored.

Subsequently, the control unit 101 of the TX 100 and the control unit201 of the RX 200 execute processing of the calibration phase (413) andtransit to the PT phase. In the PT phase, the RX 200 supplies power tothe load (414). The control unit 201 of the RX 200 may display (416) onthe display unit 202 a message that the power is restricted based on thereason notification (412). In the same manner, the control unit 101 ofthe TX 100 may display (415) on the display unit 106 a message that thepower is restricted based on the device authentication result (reasonnotification). For example, it may display a message that “executinglow-speed charging since USB authentication was not successful (becauseof a USB device)” based on the USB authentication results and the WPTauthentication result of the RESULT packet. By this display, the usercan know that charging will take a longer time than when the power isnot restricted and can take measures such as exchanging the USB cable orthe USB adapter to a USB-authentication supporting product and the like.The display may also refer to the WPT authentication result, and it isobvious that the same effect can be achieved. Also, in a case withoutpower restriction, the display may be executed by displaying differentcolors or lighting patterns of LED. The same effect can be achieved bynotifying the user by using a sound or vibration different from thoseused in the case without power restriction.

In this embodiment, the WPC power transmission apparatus is activatedafter it is determined whether to restrict the transmission power by theUSB authentication. However, in a case in which transmission powerrestriction by the USB authentication has been determined aftersimultaneously activating the USB devices and the WPC apparatuses,asynchronously performing the USB authentication and the WPTauthentication, and starting the power transmission between the WPCapparatuses, the same effect can be achieved by restricting the WPCpower transmission by renegotiation. However, additional effects can beexpected by activating the WPC power transmission apparatus afterdetermining whether to restrict the transmission power in the USBauthentication according to this embodiment. Since whether to restrictthe transmission power is determined already in the USB authenticationwhen the TX 100 is to determine the GP in the negotiation phase (411),the process of renegotiation need not be generated.

<Backward Compatibility with WPT Authentication Operation>

As greater power is transmitted by the WPC specification, a WPTauthentication function needs to be added to a legacy WPC specificationin order to avoid risks. In this case, a TX which has the WPTauthentication function must ensure backward compatibility with not onlyan RX which also has the WPT authentication function but also with alegacy RX. Similarly, the RX which has the WPT authentication functionmust ensure backward compatibility with a legacy TX. However, atechnique for adding a WPT authentication function in compliance withthe legacy WPC specification while also considering backwardcompatibility has not been proposed.

Hence, in a case in which new device authentication is added to astandard specification of wireless power transmission, a mode ofmaintaining compatibility with the standard specification of a versionwhich is not compliant with the new device authentication will bedescribed hereinafter.

FIG. 7 is a flowchart showing the operation of the control unit 1101 ofthe TX 100 according to this embodiment. FIGS. 8A to 8B are sequencecharts for explaining the backward compatibility by the TX 100 or the RX200 in a version A. Although the WPT authentication according to thisembodiment will be described as challenge-response device authenticationusing a digital certificate in the same manner as the USBauthentication, the WPT authentication is not limited to this. The TX100 operates as an initiator that transmits a challenge text to the RX200, and the RX 200 operates as a responder that encrypts the challengetext and transmits the encrypted challenge text to the TX 100. FIGS. 9Ato 9C are flowcharts showing the operation of the control unit 201 ofthe RX 200. FIG. 10A is a view showing an example of the bit arrangementof a configuration packet conforming to the WPC specification. FIG. 10Bis a view showing an example of the bit arrangement of a powertransmitter p compatibility packet conforming to the WPC specification.Note that the same reference symbols denote the same componentsthroughout the drawings.

The categories for TX and RX based on the WPC specification v1.2.2 willbe described before explanation of the sequence charts and flowcharts. ATX and a RX each with GP of 5 W are categorized under the Basic PowerProfile (BPP). A TX and an RX each with GP which is higher than 5 W andnot more than 15 W are categorized under the Extended Power Profile(EPP). In addition, in the WPC specification v1.2.2, a function toexecute a negotiation between a TX and an RX in relation to the GP hasbeen added. The TX and the RX, which are categorized under EPP, bothhave the negotiation function, The TX and the RX, which are categorizedunder BPP, are further categorized into an apparatus which supports thenegotiation function and an apparatus which does not support thenegotiation function. A TX can determine whether an RX has a negotiationfunction by a Neg bit (Bank4, bit7) in the configuration packet (FIG.10A) in which the setting information of the RX is described, if the Negbit is “1”, the RX has a negotiation function. If the Neg bit is “0”,the RX does not have a negotiation function. In this embodiment, unlessotherwise specified, it will be assumed that a legacy TX and a legacy RXeach have a negotiation function, and that the negotiation is executedin the negotiation phase.

A TX and an RX of the WPC specification version A in compliance with theWPT authentication must be backward compatible with each of the legacyRX and the legacy TX in compliance with the WPC specification v1.2.2,That is, a TX in compliance with the WPC specification. version A needsto operate without contradiction with respect to an RX which is incompliance with a WPC specification of an earlier version than theversion A. In the same manner, a RX in compliance with the WPCspecification version A needs to operate without contradiction withrespect to a TX which is in compliance with a WPC specification of anearlier version than the version A.

Hence, the backward compatibility of the TX 100 and the RX 200 which arein compliance with the version A shown in this embodiment with the WPCspecification v1.2.2 will be described with reference to FIGS. 7, 8A to8B, and 9A to 9C. The TX and the RX in compliance with the legacy EPP ofthe WPC specification v1.2.2 undergo a state transition in the order ofthe selection phase, the ping phase, the I & C phase, the negotiationphase, the calibration phase, and the PT phase. In a case in which atleast one of the legacy TX and the legacy RX is a BPP device which doesnot have a negotiation function, the TX and the RX undergo a statetransition in the order of the selection phase, the ping phase, the I &C phase, and the PT phase.

As described above, if both the TX and the RX are in compliance with theauthentication phase, the TX and the RX transit in the order of theselection phase, the ping phase, the I & C phase, the authenticationphase, the negotiation phase, the calibration phase, and the PT phase.Here, the authentication phase is to be executed before the negotiationphase. The reason is as follows. FIG. 6 described how the value of theGP changes in accordance with the WPT authentication result. Consider acase in which the transition to the authentication phase is executedafter the GP has been determined by the negotiation between the TX andthe RX in the negotiation phase. In this case, in order to avoid theabove-described risks due to the result of the authentication phase, itis possible that the already determined GP may he changed again. Suchre-changing of the GP is problematic in that it complicates the order ofthe transition to the PT phase, thereby taking more time. By executingthe authentication phase before the negotiation phase, the GP can berestricted in the authentication phase, and the GP can be determined inthe negotiation phase under the premise of the restricted GP. In thismanner, by restricting the GP in the authentication phase before thenegotiation phase, the re-changing of the GP does not occur in thetransition to the PT phase, and the transition to the PT phase can beexecuted quickly.

<Case in Which Both TX 100 and RX 200 Are Legacy TX and Legacy RX,Respectively>

First, FIG. 8A which is a sequence chart of the WPC specification v1.2.2in a case when both the TX 100 and the RX 200 are apparatuses incompliance with a legacy EPP will be described. Note that in thefollowing explanation, assume that the USB authentication operations ofthe USB cable 300 and the AC adapter 301 by the TX 100 have beensuccessful. Only the parts related to the legacy EPP are used in theflowcharts of FIGS. 7 and 9A. That is, the processes of steps S703 toS708 in FIG. 7 are not present in the legacy TX, and the processes ofsteps S903 to S905 and S908 in FIG. 9A are not present in the legacy RX.Note that only the sequence of the I & C phase and the sequences of thesubsequent phases related to backward compatibility are shown in FIG.8A.

After the processes of the selection phase and the ping phase have beenperformed between the TX 100 and the RX 200, the state transits to the I& C phase (step S701), In the I & C phase, the RX 200 transmits anidentification packet (ID packet) to the TX 100 (800, step S901). The IDpacket stores, other than the individual identification information ofitself, an information element identifying the supported WPCspecification version (v1.2.2 in this case). Next, the RX 200 transmitsa configuration packet to the TX 100 (801, step S901). The configurationpacket of the WPC specification v1.2.2 includes a maximum power valuewhich is the specific value of maximum power the RX 200 can supply tothe load and a Neg bit which is a bit indication whether there is anegotiation function. Here, the RX 200 sets “1” in the Neg bit andindicates that it has a negotiation function.

Upon receiving the ID packet and the configuration packet from the RX200 (step S702), the TX 100 determines whether the RX 200 has anegotiation function (step S704), Since the RX 200 has a negotiationfunction (YES in step S704), the TX 100 transmits an ACK to theconfiguration packet (step S713, 802) and transits to the negotiationphase (step S709). Note that in a case in which the RX 200 is a BPP (Negbit is 0) not supporting the negotiation function, the TX 100 willtransit to the PT phase (step S712) without transmitting the ACK.Similarly, in a case in which the TX 100 itself is BPP and does notsupport the negotiation function, the TX 100 will transit to the PTphase without transmitting the ACK. In this case, the GP is restrictedto 5 W,

The reception of the ACK (YES in step S902) allows the RX 200 to knowthat the TX 100 supports the negotiation function, and the RX transitsto the negotiation phase (step S906). The RX 200 then transmits aspecific request packet to request power (for example, 15 W) necessaryfor the self-apparatus, In this case, the RX 200 transmits, as theinformation element of the specific request packet, a specific request(15 W) indicating a request for 15 W for GP to the TX 100 (803). Here,after transmitting the configuration packet, the RX 200 of the WPCspecification v1.2.2 will determine (step S909) that the TX 100 is a BPPwithout a negotiation function if the RX 200 does not receive (NO instep S902) an ACK within 15 ms. Subsequently, the RX 200 transits tothe. PT phase (step S910).

Upon receiving the specific request (15 W), the TX 100 compares its owntransmission power with the 15 W. If power transmission is possible, theTX transmits an ACK representing a positive acknowledgement to the RX200. Otherwise, the TX transmits a NAK indicating the rejection of therequest to the RX. Here, the TX determines (step S710) the GP of 15 W bydetermining that power of 15 W can be transmitted and transmits (804) anACK. The TX 100 transits to the calibration phase.

Upon receiving the ACK from the TX 100 to the specific request (803),the RX 200 transits to the calibration phase (step S907). In thecalibration phase, the TX 100 performs adjustment based on thecorrelation between the value of the transmission power from the TX 100to the RX 200 measured in the TX 100 and the value of the received powermeasured in the RX 200. After the completion of the calibration phase,the TX 100 and the RX 200 transit to the PT phase and start the wirelesspower transmission (steps S712 and S910).

As described above, the TX 100 of the WPC specification v1.2.2determines whether the RX 200 is an EPP and a BPP which has anegotiation function or a BPP which does not have a negotiation functionbased on the Neg bit. In the former case, the TX transits to thenegotiation phase. In the latter case, the TX transits to the PT phase.

In addition, by a determination based on whether an ACK is received as aresponse within 15 ms from the transmission of the configuration packet,the RX 200 of the WPC specification v1.2.2 transits to the negotiationphase if the ACK is received. Otherwise, the RX transits to the PTphase.

By the above-described operation, in the WPC specification v1.2.2, thecompatibility is ensured between the TX 100 and the RX 200 that havenegotiation functions and the TX 100 and the RX 200 that do not have thenegotiation functions.

<Case in Which TX 100 is Version A and RX 200 is Legacy RX>

A case in which the TX 100 is in compliance with the version A and theRX 200 is a legacy RX will be described with reference to FIGS. 8B, 6,7, and 9A. Note that in the following explanation, assume that the USBauthentication operations of the USB cable 300 and the AC adapter 301 bythe TX 100 have been successful. Since the entire following descriptionis a description related to the backward compatibility of the WPCspecification, it is obvious that the description is applicable even inan arrangement in which the TX 100 does not include the firstauthentication unit.

First, an Auth bit in the configuration packet will be defined. FIG. 10Ashows the arrangement of a configuration packet according to the WPCspecification v1.2.2. Note that explanation of parts unrelated to thepresent invention will be omitted. The configuration packet includes aplurality of reserved areas, for example, a reserved area 1001 from bit4to bit6 in Bank2, a reserved area 1000 from bit0 to bit7 in Bank1, and areserved area 1002 from bit2 to bit 0 in Bank4. In this embodiment, theAuth bit is arranged in the bit6 of Bank2. However, the arrangement ofthe Auth bit is not limited to this, and it may be arranged in otherreserved areas. Note that each bit in a reserved area is 0 in the WPCspecification v1.2.2. If the RX 200 itself supports the WPTauthentication, the RX stores “1” in the Auth bit. Otherwise, “0” isstored in the Auth bit.

The TX 100 determines whether the RX 200 supports the WPT authenticationby the Auth bit in the configuration packet (step S703). Since the RX200 is a legacy RX, the Auth bit is “0”. The TX 100 determines that theRX 200 does not support the WPT authentication (NO in step S703) andtransits to the negotiation phase. Here, if the TX receives a requestfor a GP of 15 W from the RX 200, the TX transmits an NAK indicating therejection of the request to the RX 200 (805). As described in FIG. 6,this is because the RX 200 does not support the WPT authentication, andthus the TX 100 determines that a power of 15 W should not betransmitted in order to avoid risks.

When its request is rejected by a NAK, the RX 200 transmits a generalrequest defined by the WPC specification v1.2.2 to know the GP valuesettable by the TX 100. Here, among general requests, a messagerequesting a transmitter capability packet will be represented as ageneral request (capability) in this embodiment. A transmittercapability packet includes a settable GP value and is a packet definedby the WPC specification v1.2.2.

Upon receiving the general request (capability) (806), the TX 100determines 5 W of GP in correspondence with a state of WPTauthentication non-support (row 603) and a state of USB authenticationsuccess (column 602) based on the above-described FIG. 6. The TX 100stores the information indicating 5 W in the guaranteed power value ofthe power transmitter capability packet and transmits the packet to theRX 200 (807).

As described above, by using the Auth bit defined in this embodiment,the TX 100 in compliance with the WPC specification version A canoperate without contradiction with respect to the legacy RX incompliance with the WPC specification of an earlier version than theversion A.

<Case in Which TX 100 and RX 200 Both Comply with Version A>

Next, a case in which both the TX 100 and the RX 200 are in compliancewith the WPT authentication processing will be described with referenceto FIGS. 6, 7, 8E, and 9A. Note that in the following explanation,assume that the USB authentication operations of the USB cable 300 andthe AC adapter 301 by the TX 100 have been successful. The operations ofthe TX 100 and the RX 200 of the version A complying with the WPTauthentication will be described before the explanation.

The RX 200 of the version A transmits, to the TX 100, a configurationpacket in which “1” is stored in the Auth bit. Based on the Auth bit ofthe configuration packet, the TX 100 of the version A determines thatthe RX 200 supports the WPT authentication (YES in step S703) andtransmits an ACK(auth) to the RX 200 (step S705, 802). An ACK(auth) isan acknowledgement that can he distinguished from an ACK, is configuredfrom a bit pattern different from the ACK, and is a packet indicatingthe acknowledgement of the configuration packet and that the TX 100supports the WPT authentication.

Upon determining that the RX 200 supports the WPT authentication in thismanner, the TX 100 transmits an ACK(auth) and transits to theauthentication phase (step S706). On the other hand, upon receiving theACK(auth) (YES in step S903), the RX 200 determines that the TX 100supports the WPT authentication (step S904) and transits to theauthentication phase (S905).

Processes 814 to 820 in FIG. 8E show an example of the WPTauthentication according to this embodiment. First, the TX 100 transmitsa GET_DIGEST message to the RX 200 (814, S707). A GET_DIGEST packet is apacket requesting the information related to a digital certificate heldby the RX 200. The RX 200 transmits a DIGEST in response to theGET_DIGEST packet (815). A DIGEST is information related to the digitalcertificate possessed by the RX 200. Next, the TX 100 transmits aGET_CERTIFICATE packet requesting the detailed information related tothe digital certificate to the RX 200 (816). The RX 200 transmits aCERTIFICATE in response to the GET_CERTIFICATE packet (817).

Next, the TX 100 transmits a CHALLENGE message including a challengetext to the RX (818), and the RX 200 transmits a RESPONSE in which thechallenge text has been encrypted to the TX 100 (819), After confirmingthe validity of the RESPONSE, the TX 100 transmits RESULT (success) tothe RX (820, step S708) and transits to the negotiation phase (stepS709). A RESULT(success) packet indicates a RESPONSE result that WPTauthentication has been successful. Upon receiving the RESULT(success),the RX 200 transits to the negotiation phase (step S906).

In the negotiation phase, the TX 100 executes a negotiation operation bydetermining GP of 15 W corresponding to the state of WPT authenticationsuccess (row 605) and the state of the USB authentication success(column 602) based on the above-described FIG. 6. Upon receiving arequest for GP of 15 W from the RX 200 (803), the TX 100 itself refersto FIG. 6 to set the GP value of 15 W for the negotiation. Hence, the TXtransmits an ACK acknowledging the request to the RX 200 (804). Ifauthentication fails as a result of RESPONSE, the TX 100 transmitsRESULT(fail), indicating a failure, instead of the RESULT(success) tothe RX 200. The TX then determines the GP value in the subsequentnegotiation phase based on FIG. 6. Alternatively, the TX 100 can stopthe power transmission unit 103 after transmitting the RESULT(fail).

As described above, the TX 100 according to this embodiment can operatenot only with respect to an RX in compliance with a WPC specification ofan earlier version than the version A but also with respect to an RX incompliance with the version A without contradiction.

Here, a supplementary explanation will be given about the time intervalbetween packets from the GET_DIGEST (814) to the RESULT(success) (820).In, for example, the negotiation phase of the WPC specification v1.2.2.,the response from the TX 100 to the packet of the RX 200 is required tobe within 10 ms from the trailing edge of the packet of the RX 200 tothe leading edge of the response packet of the TX 100.

However, an initiator (TX 100) in the authentication phase requiresencryption/decryption processing to confirm the validity of each packet(DIGEST, CERTIFICATE, and RESPONSE) which are related to the digitalcertificate and are transmitted by the RX 200. Hence, a responserequires time in the authentication phase. Therefore, in theauthentication phase, a long response time is set compared to theresponse times of other phases. In this embodiment, the response time isset to 50 ms. That is, in FIG. 8E, the response time is the time fromDIGEST to GET_CERTIFICATE, the time from the CERTIFICATE to CHALLENGE,and the time from RESPONSE to RESULT(success). Prolonging the responsetime has the effect of decreasing the need for the control unit 101 ofthe TX 100 to operate at a high speed and implementing cost reduction byreducing the power consumption of the control unit 101 and using a lowerspeed CPU.

Note that although the TX 100 determined whether the power receivingapparatus supports the WPT authentication by the Auth bit of theconfiguration packet, this may be determined by the version informationin the ID packet. The same effect can be achieved if the TX determinesthat the power receiving apparatus supports the WPT authentication whenthe version information indicates the version A (or any subsequentversion) or if the TX determines that the power receiving apparatus doesnot support the WPT authentication when the version informationindicates an earlier version than the version A.

<Case 1 in Which TX is Legacy TX and RX is Version A>

A case in which the TX 100 is a legacy TX and the RX 200 is incompliance with the version A will be described with reference to FIGS.8C, 6, and 9A. Note that in the following explanation, assume that theUSB authentication operations of the USB cable 300 and the AC adapter301 by the TX 100 have been successful. The operation of the RX 200 incompliance with the version A will be described first.

The RX 200 notifies the TX 100 by transmitting a configuration packetthat it supports the WPT authentication (800, 801). However, since theTX 100 is a legacy TX, it will ignore the Auth bit. Since the RX 200 isin compliance with the negotiation function, the TX 100 transmits andACK and transits to the negotiation phase (YES in step S704, step S713,and step S709).

Upon receiving the ACK (802, YES in step S902), the RX 200 determinesthat the TX 100 does not support the WPT authentication and is a legacyTX (step S908). This is because, since the RX itself supports the WPTauthentication, an ACK(auth) should have been received if the TX 100also supports the WPT authentication. Note that if the RX 200 does notreceive the ACK within 15 ms from the transmission of the configurationpacket (NO in step S902) and also does not receive the ACK(auth) (NO instep S903), the process advances to step S909. In this case, the RX 200determines that the TX 100 is a BPP and does not support the negotiationfunction (step S909), and transits to the PT phase (step S910).

The RX 200 executes GP negotiation in the negotiation phase, but the RX200 determines that power of 15 W should not be received to avoid theabove-described risks as described in FIG. 6. The RX 200 determines GPof 5 W corresponding to the state of WPT authentication non-support (row603) and the state of the USB authentication success (column 602) as theGP for the negotiation and transmits a specific request (5 W) (809). TheRX 200 receives an ACK from the TX 100 (810) and ends the negotiationphase. The RX 200 transits (step S907) to the calibration phase andtransits (step S910) to the PT phase after executing predeteiniineclprocessing.

As described above, the RX 200 in compliance with the WPC specificationversion A can operate without contradiction with respect to the TX 100in compliance with the WPC specification of an earlier version than theversion A. Furthermore, as described in FIG. 8E, the RX 200 can operatewithout contradiction even in a case in which the TX 100 supports theWPT authentication.

<Case 2 in Which TX is Legacy TX and RX is Version A>

In the above-description, in a case in which the RX 200 is in compliancewith the version A, whether the TX 100 supports the WPT authenticationand whether the TX is in compliance with the negotiation function weredetermined based on the response to the configuration packet from the TX100. More specifically, an example in which the above-describeddetermination is made based on whether an ACK or an ACK(auth) isreceived within 15 ms from the transmission of the configuration orbased on whether both have not been received has been described. Here,another example of determining whether the TX 100 is in compliance withthe version A will be described with reference to FIGS. 8D and 9C. Notethat in the following explanation, assume that the USB authenticationoperations of the USB cable 300 and the AC adapter 301 by the TX 100have been successful.

Upon receiving an ACK in response to the configuration packet, the RX200 transmits an Auth Req to request the execution of the WPTauthentication (step S912, 810). The Auth Req is an authenticationrequest packet to request the TX 100 to transit to the authenticationphase and is a reserved packet whose packet type is not defined in theWPC specification v1.2.2. In this embodiment, the packet header in thereserved packet defines the 0×40 packet as an Auth Req packet. Afterreturning the ACK to the configuration packet, the TX in compliance withthe version A transits to the authentication phase in response to thereception of the Auth Reg packet and starts the WPT authentication.

On the other hand, a TX which is not in compliance with the version Aoperates as follows. In the WPC specification v1.2.2, it is stipulated.that the TX will transmit a not-defined response (ND Resp) packet whenthe TX 100 sees the packet type in the negotiation phase and determinesthe reception of an unsupported packet. However, it is stipulated thatthe TX 100 will not transmit a response even if an unsupported packet isreceived in the I & C phase. The TX 100 is set to the negotiation phasesince it has transmitted the ACK (802) to the configuration packet.Hence, the TX 100 which is a legacy TX transmits an ND Resp to the RX200 in response to the Auth Req packet (811), Upon receiving the ND Resp(YES in step S913), the RX 200 determines that the TX 100 does notsupport the WPT authentication (S908) and transits to the negotiationphase without executing the WPT authentication (step S906).

Here, if the RX 200 does not receive the ND Resp in response to the AuthReq (NO in step S913) but received an ACK (YES in step S914), theprocess advances to step S904. In this case, the RX 200 determines thatthe TX 100 supports the WPT authentication (step S904), and the RXtransits to the authentication phase (step S905). Note that if the RX200 does not receive the ND Resp or the ACK in response to the Auth Req(NO in step S914), the RX 200 transmits, to the TX 100, a powertransmission stop request and returns to the selection phase (stepS915). The power transmission stop request executed by transmitting, forexample, an end of transmission packet (ETP). By transmitting a powertransmission stop request to the TX 100, an effect in which the systemcan be returned to the original state can be achieved when the WPCsequence cannot be continued due to the breakdown of the TX 100 or thedegradation of communication quality between the TX 100 and the RX 200.

In addition, in a case in which the RX 200 does not receive the ND Respor the ACK, the RX 200 may retransmit the Auth Req. This is because theTX 100 may not have been able to correctly receive the Auth Req. Also,in the WPC specification v1.2.2, it is stipulated that the TX 100 willremain in the negotiation phase when the TX 100 cannot correctly receivea packet in the negotiation phase. Hence, by retransmitting the AuthReq, there is a possibility that the sequence may be continued if the TX100 correctly receives the packet and the RX receives the ACK or the NDResp. It may be set so that an EPT is transmitted when neither an ACKnor an ND Resp is received after the Auth Req has been transmittedseveral times (about 3 times) continuously.

As described above, in a negotiation phase in which the TX 100 is toreturn a response (ND Resp) to a packet which it does not support, theRX 200 transmits a packet to determine whether the TX 100 supports theWPT authentication. Hence, the RX 200 can determine whether the WPTauthentication is supported by the TX 100 depending on the response tothe Auth Req and can operate without contradiction with respect to a TXwhich does not support the WPT authentication.

The Auth Req suffices to be a packet that can expect a response (NDResp) from the legacy TX 100. Hence, among the packets that can expect aresponse and is under the WPC specification v1.2.2, it may he a reservedpacket whose packet type has not been defined. For example, a generalrequest packet and a specific request packet are packets that can expecta response. More specifically, it may be a specific request packet whosepacket request field is reserved (0×05 to 0×EF), in this case, if the TX100 does not support the WPT authentication, the TX 100 transmits an NDResp, and the RX 200 receives this ND Resp. Alternatively, it may be ageneral request packet whose request field is reserved. In this case, ifthe TX 100 does not support the WPT authentication, the TX 100transmits, in the same manner as the ND Resp, a power transmitter datanot available packet indicating its lack of support as a response to therequest, and the RX 200 receives this packet.

Alternatively, the RX may exchange packets for determining whether theWPT authentication is supported with the TX before transmitting the AuthReq. For example, the RX 200 may transmit a general request packet torequest a power transmitter identification packet which includes theindividual identification information and the specification version ofthe TX 100. In this case, the RX 200 acquires the specification versionof the TX 100 by the general request before the transmission of the AuthReq. The RX 200 can transmit the Auth Req by determining that the WPTauthentication is supported by the TX 100 if the acquired versioninformation is version A or later. Otherwise, the RX can determine thatthe TX 100 does not support the WPT authentication.

Also, the power transmitter identification packet request may beexecuted by transmitting the same general request packet to make arequest for the power transmitter capability packet in which thecapability information of the TX 100 is stored. The power transmittercapability packet is a packet transmitted by the TX 100, which is thepower transmission apparatus, to notify the power receiving apparatus ofits power transmission capability, and the information indicating thecapability of the execution of the WPT authentication can be included inthis packet. In this case, either the bit7 or the bit6 of Bank1 or oneof bits from bit7 to bit2 of Bank2 reserved in the power transmittercapability packet (FIG. 10B) in the WPC specification v1.2.2 can bedefined as the Auth bit by the version A. “1 (WPT authenticationsupport)” or “0 (WPT authentication non-support)” is written in the Authbit. The TX 100 which is in compliance with the version A will write “1(WPT authentication support)” in the Auth bit of the power transmittercapability packet.

Furthermore, in order to receive a response to the reserved packet, theRX 200 will transmit a reserved packet when the TX 100 is in thenegotiation phase. This allows the RX to determine whether the TX 100 isa legacy TX and whether the TX supports the WPT authentication bydetermining whether the response is an ND Resp or an ACK. Since the TX100 does not respond to the reserved packet in the WPC specificationv1.2.2 even if the same packet is transmitted in the I & C phase, theabove-described determination cannot be performed.

<Case 3 in Which TX is Legacy TX and RX is Version A>

An example in which the RX 200 determines whether the TX 100 supportsthe WPT authentication based on the response to the ACK(auth) or AuthReq has been described. Another example will be described with referenceto FIG. 9B hereinafter. Note that in the following explanation, assumethat the USB authentication operations of the USB cable 300 and the ACadapter 301 by the TX 100 have been successful. After receiving the ACKin response to the configuration packet and shifting to the negotiationphase, the RX 200 determines whether a specific packet which istransmitted from the TX 100 has been received during a predeterminedtime in the authentication phase. If the specific packet is receivedwithin the predetermined time, the RX 200 determines that the TX 100supports the WPT authentication. Otherwise, the RX determines that theTX 100 does not support the WPT authentication.

The operation of the TX 100 which supports the WPT authentication willbe described before the following explanation. Upon determining from theconfiguration packet that the RX 200 supports the WPT authentication,the TX 100 transits to the authentication phase. That is, the TX 100transmits, to the RX 200, the beginning of the GET_DIGEST packet withina predetermined time from the trailing edge of the ACK to theconfiguration packet.

In a case in which the TX 100 is a legacy TX, since the RX 200 does notreceive the beginning of the GET_DIGEST packet within a predeterminedtime (NO in step S911), the RX determines that the TX 100 does notsupport the WPT authentication (step S908) and transits to thenegotiation phase. In this manner, the RX 200 operates withoutcontradiction with respect to the legacy TX 100. If the WPTauthentication is supported by the TX 100, the RX 200 receives at leastthe beginning of the GET_DIGEST packet within a predetermined time (YESin step S911). Thus, the RX 200 determines that the TX 100 supports theWPT authentication (step S904) and transits to the authentication phase(step S905).

Here, assume that the above-described predetermined time is 6 ms in thisembodiment. In the WPC specification v1.2.2, it is stipulated that theRX 200 cannot transmit the beginning of any kind of a packet for 6 msafter the reception of an ACK. Therefore, if the TX 100 transmits thebeginning of the GET_DIGEST packet at least within 6 ms, it is possibleto cause the RX 200 to transit to the authentication phase before the RX200 transmits a packet (for example, a specific request or the like)which is to be transmitted in the negotiation phase.

As described above, the RX 200 according to this embodiment can operatewithout contradiction when the TX 100 is a legacy TX and supports theWPT authentication.

<Case in Which the RX is Initiator of WPT Authentication>

FIG. 8E describes an example in which the TX 100 is the initiator.However, the present invention is not limited to this, and the RX 200may be the initiator. In this case, since the RX 200 determines that theTX 100 supports the WPT authentication by receiving the ACK(auth), theRX transits to the authentication phase. The RX 200 then transmits aGET_DIGEST packet to the TX 100. The transmission of the GET_DIGESTpacket and the subsequent authentication processing (from 814 to 820)are executed in the reverse direction of the corresponding packet arrowsshown in FIG. 8E. The RX 200 transits to the negotiation phase upontransmitting the RESULT(success). In the same manner, the TX 100transits to the negotiation phase upon receiving the RESULT(success).The same effect can be clearly achieved even when the processes areimplemented in the above described manner.

In a case in which the TX 100 receives a packet other than thepredetermined packets from the RX 200 in the authentication phase, theTX may stop the power transmission by the power transmission unit 103and transit to the selection phase. The predetermined packets refer tothe packets of 814 to 820 and are GET_DIGEST, DIGEST, GET_CERTIFICATE,CERTIFICATE, CHALLENGE, RESPONSE, and RESULT. If a packet such as thesignal strength packet indicating the voltage value of the receivedvoltage, a control error packet requesting the voltage value to beincreased/decreased, an ID packet, a configuration packet, or the likeis received in the authentication phase, the TX 100 stops the powertransmission and returns to the selection phase. In this manner, the TX100 can prevent an unexpected operation in the system by stopping thepower transmission when a packet other than the predetermined packets isreceived due to the breakdown of the RX 200 or the like in theauthentication phase.

As described above, in the contactless charging system according to thisembodiment, device authentication using a USB protocol is performedbetween a power supply apparatus (AC adapter 301) which is the powersupply source and a power transmission apparatus, and deviceauthentication using a WPT protocol is performed between the powertransmission apparatus and a power receiving apparatus. Subsequently,the transmission power of the WPC power transmission apparatus iscontrolled based on the USB device authentication result and the WPTdevice authentication result. This arrangement can implement preferablepower transmission apparatus control without the risk of overheating ofdevices present in a power supply path.

In addition, the transmission power of the WPC power transmissionapparatus is restricted based on the USB authentication result beforethe start of the power transmission from the WPC power transmissionapparatus to the power receiving apparatus. This arrangement canimplement high-speed control since the renegotiation of transmissionpower due to the restriction of the transmission power based on the USBauthentication result will not occur after the start of powertransmission by the WPC power transmission apparatus.

Other Embodiments

The power transmission method of the wireless power transmission systemaccording to the present invention is not particularly limited. Amagnetic resonance method in which power is transmitted by magneticresonant coupling between a resonator (resonant element) of the TX and aresonator (resonant element) of the RX may be employed. Alternatively, apower transmission method using an electromagnetic induction method, anelectrical resonance method, a microwave method, a laser, or the likemay be employed.

The TX and the RX each may be, for example, an image input apparatussuch as a scanner or an image capturing apparatus (a camera, a videocamera, or the like) or an image output apparatus such as a printer, acopy machine, or a projector. A storage device such as a hard diskdevice or a memory device may be used as the TX or the RX, or aninformation processing apparatus such as a personal computer (PC) or asmartphone may be used as the TX or the RX.

In addition, each of the flowcharts shown in FIGS. 5, 7, and 9A to 9C isstarted when the control unit is powered on. Note that each of theprocessing operations shown in FIGS. 5 and 7 is implemented by thecontrol unit 101 executing a program stored in the memory 107 of the TX100. The each of the flowcharts shown in FIGS. 9A to 9C is executed bythe control unit 201 executing a program stored in the memory 209 of theRX 200.

Note that at least some of the processes shown in the flowcharts of 5,7, and 9A to 9C may be implemented by hardware. If the processes are tobe implemented by hardware, for example, a predetermined compiler can beused to automatically generate a dedicated circuit on an FPGA from aprogram for implementing each step. An FPGA is an acronym for fieldprogrammable gate array. Furthermore, some of the processes may beimplemented by forming a gate array circuit as hardware in the samemanner as the FPGA.

Embodiment(s) of the present invention can also be realized by acomputer of a system or apparatus that reads out and executes computerexecutable instructions (e.g., one or more programs) recorded on astorage medium (which may also be referred to more fully as anon-transitory computer-readable storage medium) to perform thefunctions of one or more of the above-described embodiment(s) and/orthat includes one or more circuits (e.g., application specificintegrated circuit (ASIC)) for performing the functions of one or moreof the above-described embodiment(s), and by a method performed by thecomputer of the system or apparatus by, for example, reading out andexecuting the computer executable instructions from the storage mediumto perform the functions of one or more of the above-describedembodiment(s) and/or controlling the one or more circuits to perform thefunctions of one or more of the above-described embodiment(s). Thecomputer may comprise one or more processors (e.g., central processingunit (CPU), micro processing unit (MPU)) and may include a network ofseparate computers or separate processors to read out and execute thecomputer executable instructions. The computer executable instructionsmay be provided to the computer, for example, from a network or thestorage medium. The storage medium may include, for example, one or moreof a hard disk, a random-access memory (RAM), a read only memory (ROM),a storage of distributed computing systems, an optical disk (such as acompact disc (CD), digital versatile disc (DVD), or Blu-ray Disc (BD)™),a flash memory device, a memory card, and the like.

While the present invention has been described with reference toexemplary embodiments, it is to be understood that the invention is notlimited to the disclosed exemplary embodiments. The scope of thefollowing claims is to be accorded the broadest interpretation so as toencompass all such modifications and equivalent structures andfunctions.

This application claims the benefit of Japanese Patent Application No.2017-163671, filed Aug. 28, 2017, which is hereby incorporated byreference herein in its entirety.

1. A power transmission apparatus that transmits power wirelessly to apower receiving apparatus by using power supplied from a power supplyapparatus, comprising: a first authentication unit configured to executedevice authentication with the power supply apparatus; a secondauthentication unit configured to execute device authentication with thepower receiving apparatus; and a negotiation unit configured to performnegotiation related to transmission power with the power receivingapparatus based on a result of the device authentication by the firstauthentication unit and a result of the device authentication by thesecond authentication unit.
 2. The apparatus according to claim 1,further comprising: a confirmation unit configured to confirm that thepower receiving apparatus supports the device authentication by thesecond authentication unit.
 3. The apparatus according to claim 1,wherein the second authentication unit responds to an authenticationrequest requesting the execution of device authentication from the powerreceiving apparatus and starts the device authentication.
 4. Theapparatus according to claim 1, wherein information indicating thepresence of a device authentication capability of the secondauthentication unit is included in a packet which is to be transmittedto notify the power receiving apparatus of a power transmissioncapability.
 5. The apparatus according to claim 1, wherein in a case inwhich the device authentication by the first authentication unit isunsuccessful, transmission power set as a result of the negotiation unitis comparatively smaller than transmission power set as a result of thenegotiation unit in a case in which the device authentication by thefirst authentication unit is successful.
 6. The apparatus according toclaim 1, wherein in a case in which the device authentication by thefirst authentication unit and the device authentication by the secondauthentication unit are successful, the negotiation unit determines thetransmission power based on the maximum capability of the powertransmission apparatus and the power receiving apparatus.
 7. Theapparatus according to claim 1, wherein in a case in which anauthentication subject device does not support the device authenticationby the first authentication unit or the device authentication by thesecond authentication unit, the transmission power is set comparativelysmaller than the transmission power in a case in which the deviceauthentication by the first authentication unit and the deviceauthentication by the second authentication unit are successful.
 8. Theapparatus according to claim 1, wherein as a result of the deviceauthentication by the first authentication unit or the deviceauthentication by the second authentication unit, if it is determinedthat authentication has failed although authentication is supported inat least one authentication target device, power transmission to thepower receiving apparatus is stopped.
 9. The apparatus according toclaim 1, wherein the device authentication by the first authenticationunit is executed before the device authentication by the secondauthentication unit.
 10. The apparatus according to claim 1, furthercomprising: a notification unit configured to notify the power receivingapparatus of the result of the device authentication by the firstauthentication unit and the result of the device authentication by thesecond authentication unit.
 11. The apparatus according to claim 1,further comprising: an informing unit configured to inform a user of theresult of the negotiation unit and one of the result of the deviceauthentication by the first authentication unit and the result of thedevice authentication by the second authentication unit which is relatedto reduction in transmission power by the negotiation unit.
 12. Theapparatus according to claim 1, wherein the second authentication unitexecutes the device authentication by executing communication using acoil for transmitting power wirelessly to the power receiving unit. 13.The apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the negotiation unitdetermines transmission power to be permitted based on the result of thedevice authentication by the first authentication unit and the result ofthe device authentication by the second authentication unit, andnegotiates so that transmission power to the power receiving apparatuswill be not more than the determined transmission power.
 14. Theapparatus according to claim 1, wherein the power supply apparatus isone of an adapter and a cable for supplying power, and the firstauthentication unit executes device authentication on one of the adapterand the cable.
 15. The apparatus according to claim 1, wherein acommunication protocol to be used in the device authentication by thefirst authentication unit is different from a communication protocol tobe used in the device authentication by the second authentication unit.16. The apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the secondauthentication unit executes the device authentication on the powerreceiving apparatus based on a digital certificate held by the powerreceiving apparatus.
 17. A power receiving apparatus that receives powerwirelessly transmitted from a power transmission apparatus, comprising:an authentication unit configured to execute device authentication withthe power transmission apparatus; a notification unit configured tonotify the power transmission apparatus that the power receivingapparatus has a function for executing a device authentication to thepower transmission apparatus; a determination unit configured todetermine, based on a response from the power transmission apparatus tothe notification by the notification unit, whether the powertransmission apparatus supports the device authentication; an executionunit configured to execute the device authentication by theauthentication unit if it is determined by the determination unit thatthe power transmission apparatus supports the device authentication; andpower receiving unit configured to receive power transmitted from thepower transmission apparatus for supplying power corresponding to one ofa result of the determination by the determination unit and a result ofthe device authentication by the execution unit.
 18. The apparatusaccording to claim 17, wherein the notification unit includesinformation indicating the presence of the device authenticationcapability in a predetermined packet.
 19. The apparatus according toclaim 18, wherein when a signal indicating the presence of the deviceauthentication capability is received from the power transmissionapparatus in response to the predetermined packet, the determinationunit determines that the power transmission apparatus supports thedevice authentication.
 20. The apparatus according to claim 18, whereinwhen the device authentication with the power transmission apparatus isstarted within a predetermined time after the reception of a response tothe predetermined packet, the determination unit determines that thepower transmission apparatus supports the device authentication.
 21. Theapparatus according to claim 17, wherein the notification unit transmitsa device authentication requesting packet to the power transmissionapparatus, and the determination unit determines whether the powertransmission apparatus supports the device authentication based on aresponse to the device authentication requesting packet from the powertransmission apparatus.
 22. A wireless power transmission systemcomprising: a power supply apparatus; a power transmission apparatusconfigured to transmit power wirelessly by using power supplied from thepower supply apparatus; a power receiving apparatus configured toreceive power wirelessly transmitted from the power transmissionapparatus; a first authentication unit configured to cause the powertransmission apparatus to execute device authentication with the powersupply apparatus; a second authentication unit configured to cause thepower transmission apparatus to execute device authentication with thepower receiving apparatus; and a negotiation unit configured to causethe power transmission apparatus and the power receiving apparatus toperform negotiation related to transmission power based on a result ofthe device authentication by the first authentication unit and a resultof the device authentication by the second authentication unit.
 23. Amethod of controlling a power transmission apparatus that transmitspower wirelessly to a power receiving apparatus by using power suppliedfrom a power supply apparatus, the method comprising: executing deviceauthentication with the power supply apparatus; executing deviceauthentication with the power receiving apparatus; and performingnegotiation related to transmission power with the power receivingapparatus based on a result obtained in the executing the deviceauthentication with the power supply apparatus and a result obtained inthe executing the device authentication with the power receivingapparatus.
 24. A method of controlling a power receiving apparatus thatreceives power transmitted wirelessly from a power transmissionapparatus, the method comprising: executing device authentication withthe power transmission apparatus; notifying the power transmissionapparatus that the power receiving apparatus has a function forexecuting a device authentication to the power transmission apparatus;determining, based on a response from the power transmission apparatusto a notification in the notifying, whether the power transmissionapparatus supports the device authentication; and executing deviceauthentication in the executing if it is determined in the determiningthat the power transmission apparatus supports the deviceauthentication.
 25. A method of controlling a wireless powertransmission system comprising: a power supply apparatus, a powertransmission apparatus configured to transmit power wirelessly by usingpower supplied from the power supply apparatus, and a power receivingapparatus configured to receive power wirelessly transmitted from thepower transmission apparatus, the method comprising: causing the powertransmission apparatus to execute device authentication with the powersupply apparatus, causing the power transmission apparatus to executedevice authentication with the power receiving apparatus, and causingthe power transmission apparatus and the power receiving apparatus toperform negotiation related to transmission power based on a resultobtained in the causing the power transmission apparatus to execute thedevice authentication with the power supply apparatus and a resultobtained in the causing the power transmission apparatus to execute thedevice authentication with the power receiving apparatus.
 26. Anon-transitory computer-readable storage medium storing a computerprogram for causing a computer to perform a method of controlling apower transmission apparatus that transmits power wirelessly to a powerreceiving apparatus by using power supplied from a power supplyapparatus, the method comprising: executing device authentication withthe power supply apparatus; executing device authentication with thepower receiving apparatus; and performing negotiation related totransmission power with the power receiving apparatus based on a resultobtained in the executing the device authentication with the powersupply apparatus and a result obtained in the executing the deviceauthentication with the power receiving apparatus
 27. A non-transitorycomputer-readable storage medium storing a program for causing acomputer to perform a method of controlling a power receiving apparatusthat receives power transmitted wirelessly from a power transmissionapparatus, the method comprising: executing device authentication withthe power transmission apparatus; notifying the power transmissionapparatus that the power receiving apparatus has a function forexecuting a device authentication to the power transmission apparatus;determining, based on a response from the power transmission apparatusto a notification in the notifying, whether the power transmissionapparatus supports the device authentication; and executing deviceauthentication in the executing if it is determined in the determiningthat the power transmission apparatus supports the deviceauthentication.